Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from August, 2023

CILIP 125: The next generation of leaders

Seventeen of the CILIP 125 List of the next generation of leaders are Information School alumni or students. CILIP members and colleagues were asked to nominate individuals within the profession to “recognise and honour a new generation of librarians, information and knowledge management professionals who drive positive change, make a difference and have an impact across all sectors.” CILIP Honorary Fellow Sheila Webber, leader of the iSchool's Library and Information Services Management programmes: "It's fantastic to see so many of our former students on this list of passionate and talented individuals. It's also great to have two of our current students already recognised for their drive and contribution!" Arved Werner Kirschbaum said:"I felt incredibly honoured and also very happy to be named as one of the CILIP 125, because it felt like a confirmation of the path I have chosen for myself: to become a librarian and devote my life to making a positive diff

Just how good can academic peer review be? Evidence from the near ideal case of theoretical physics

 Academic research normally goes through a peer review stage before it appears in a journal or book. This usually involves an editor selecting two or more scholars from the field that have relevant expertise and asking them to assess the submission. These reviewers then make comments about various aspects of the submission as well as giving an overall recommendation, such as: accept, ask for minor revisions and then accept, ask for major revisions and then reevaluate, or reject. The purposes of this exercise include filtering out flawed studies or papers with little value and helping the authors to improve their work by correcting errors or suggesting additional perspectives to consider. In an ideal world, every paper that passes peer review is error-free, clear and makes a valuable contribution to academic knowledge. In practice, however, there is no absolute truth and so reviewers must make judgements about the extent to which each work is high enough quality to be published. In theo

Further reflections on CILIP Conference 2023

  Current student Maria shares her experience of this year's CILIP Conference in Birmingham I was one of the five fortunate students of Information School to receive a student bursary for attending the CILIP Conference in Birmingham. Participating in such an event was a unique experience for me because it was an opportunity for librarians to come together and discuss the future of librarianship. Specifically, the main topics of the conference concentrated on how the world of libraries changes underlying the important role of leadership, management, wellbeing, and AI. This was my first time attending an academic conference, so I experienced it as something challenging with enthusiasm. Initially, I felt a bit out of place, but soon after I met the other participants and my team from the University of Sheffield, I started to feel more comfortable. Also, this feeling got away when I started to participate in parallel sessions and help at the Information School exhibition stand. This al