Skip to main content

Some insights from LILAC '23

Current student Sophie attended the LILAC Conference - the Information Literacy Conference - in April and shares her thoughts below!

LILAC conference is THE event for the Information Literacy world – and I was lucky to be part of it this year. This was my first big library conference, so I am very grateful for the chance to have been there. 

LILAC took place over three days in the law building of the University of Cambridge.  I have lived in Cambridge before and I loved delving back into the atmosphere and culture of this city. With its numerous libraries, the city was the perfect setting for LILAC.

I have learned so much and met so many interesting people over the three days, I could write a whole book about it! I will try and focus on three main topics: Accessible referencing styles, decolonisation, and survival.

Accessible referencing styles

I visited three sessions that focused on referencing styles and accessibility, or both:  Maria King’s keynote on accessibility in academic libraries, Fiona Watkins’ presentation of her research on referencing styles as barriers to students with learning disabilities and the panel discussion on referencing styles as an oppressive information practice with Caroline Ball, Tom Peach, Diane Pennington and Ludovica Price. 

Maria’s conversation with Darren Flynn opened my eyes to the barriers and drawbacks disabled students are facing, especially from academics, who want them ‘to get on with it’. Similar pushbacks are also faced by staff and often single persons advocate for accessibility in organisations. My takeaway point was that flexibility is key when it comes to accessibility. I have written an assignment on disability last term and having some of my points reflected at the conference was a confidence boost. Additionally, I hope to feed back what I learned to my workplace.

Fiona Watkins presented her research on referencing styles and dyslexia. She made us fill out a reading comprehension test, which felt a bit cruel in the morning after the conference party but it made me understand the student perspective better, a valuable insight in itself. Fiona concluded that numerical referencing styles are more suited for dyslexic students, however, these don’t work well with screen-readers. Thus, again, the conclusion was to be flexible. This presentation made me reflect on my use of referencing styles as a student and how restrictive the systems in place can be.

Another panel discussed problems with referencing more holistically. They noted that there is no mechanism to cite oral and indigenous knowledge in Western referencing styles and that disambiguation of names can be an issue. The speakers clarified that they did not aim to find solutions but wanted to raise problems. I feel inspired to possibly do more research into the use of referencing styles, similar to Fiona Watkins’.

All three sessions made me question the status quo and how I often simply accept, for example, referencing styles. For my future work as a librarian, this insight will be valuable as I will need to reflect critically on what is offered to and expected to be used by students. 

Decolonisation

In the first keynote, a panel held by new professionals Naomi Cassidy, Tom Peach, Naomi Smith and Kristabelle Williams colonisation was one of the central topics. Decolonising universities would mean the death of the university as we know it. This statement was an eye-opener for me. The panel went on to discuss how empathy and responsibility are needed when librarians are liaising with researchers.  This talk gave me a good understanding of decolonisation and I used the knowledge I gained when talking to Rosey Crow. She presented a zine in the poster session on colonialism and the library. This bite-sized and easy-to-understand information highlighted, vocational awe, which might prevent librarians from viewing their work critically. I found these insights so valuable that I printed a number of the zines and distributed them among colleagues at my workplace. A link to the document can be found here: https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/libraries-are-not-neutral-a-pocket-sized-guide-to-libraries-and-t 

Survival

Two more sessions were very interesting for me as a student. I am thinking of writing about the information practices of a selected group of people and therefore, Andy Lacey’s presentation of his dissertation on the information practices of the homeless was incredibly useful for me. Now I know about the pitfalls and benefits of the methods he used and I can’t say I have not been warned about the workload of transcribing and analysing interviews. However, I also know that this method gives the interviewees a voice.

Andy Lacey’s presentation linked well to the session on Information Literacy as a practice for survival. Andrew Whitworth, Pam McKinney, Sheila Webber, Alison Hicks, and Geoff Walton each presented how Information Literacy is (or is not!) essential for different groups of people, such as older people. I learned about the term sousveillance – and I commented on the contribution of my group on the Padlet. What an adrenaline rush!

Other highlights

The actual sessions of a conference are obviously where I learned the most. I, however, also learned by just being there. Here are some brief highlights:

Covering the Twitter account of the Information School for a part of the conference and feeding my profile was a great experience. I am normally a little social media shy and had never used Twitter before. Posting was fun and connected me to many other delegates. I will keep this up! 

As previous bursary winners highlighted: librarians can dance! I have never seen a dance floor fill up so quickly! What a joy that lasted until three am! 

I met a great bunch of interesting people and as a distance learning student, it was especially good to put names to faces and be at an in-person event.

Thank you to Pam McKinney for organising and guiding and just generally being great as well as Yuki Graviet for being a wonderful partner in this (let’s keep in touch!) and the organisers and volunteers of the conference. 

I very much hope to be back at LILAC next year in Leeds to catch up with the friends I made, especially Lisa from London (swim buddy!) and Bastian from Zurich (German-speaking buddy!).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Generative AI paper authored by Dr Kate Miltner among British Academy's 13 discussion papers on "good" digital society

 The British Academy has today published thirteen discussion papers from a range of expert perspectives across the ‘SHAPE’ disciplines (Social Sciences, Humanities and the Arts for People and the Economy) to explore the question: ‘What are the possibilities of a good digital society?’  The papers explore a wide range of issues, from the environmental impacts of digitalised daily life to the possibilities of ‘good’ Generative AI in the cultural and creative industries, to examining more closely what we mean by a ‘good digital society’. Among the papers is one authored by information School Lecturer Dr Kate Miltner, with Dr Tim Highfield from the Department of Sociological Studies. Their paper focuses on "good" uses of generative AI in the cultural & creative industries. Alongside the papers is an introductory summary that provides a thematic overview of the papers and points to how we might conceptualise the principles that underpin these diverse visions of a good digital ...

The MORPHSS project: Materialising Open Research Practices in the Humanities and Social Sciences

MORPHSS aims to investigate and promote open research practices in the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS).  The project is designed to create frameworks and guidelines to encourage adoption of open practices in HSS as well contribute to our knowledge of such practices. The three-year, £800,000 project is a collaboration between Cambridge University Library, Cambridge Digital Humanities, Coventry University, the University of Sheffield and the University of Southampton. It is jointly funded by the Research England Development (RED) Fund, the Wellcome Trust and the Arts and Humanities Research Council.  The work to be carried out at Sheffield will be led by Stephen Pinfield, who now has a process in train to recruit a postgraduate research associate to work on the project for the next two years. The Sheffield team will contribute to the project as a whole but will focus for a significant proportion of their time investigating open practices in the Social Sciences, pa...

My Time in Sheffield as a Visiting Researcher - Dr Abdulhalik Pinar

Returning to Sheffield after more than a decade has been a mixture of nostalgia and new opportunities. I first came here in 2011 to complete my MA in Librarianship, and now, I find myself back as a visiting scholar at the Information School. My time as a visiting researcher at the University of Sheffield has been truly rewarding. I am an academic staff at Harran University in Turkey supported for this visit by Tubitak (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey). This visit has been a great opportunity for my academic and professional development. I am conducting research on artificial intelligence within GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums) institutions. I have especially valued the support of my supervisor Dr. Andrew Cox who has guided me through this process. He is an extremely helpful, supportive and understanding person. The University of Sheffield has provided me with an excellent working environment, surrounded by helpful staff and dynamic research...