Skip to main content

Survey Results: University library support to student mental health and well-being during COVID-19

Survey Results: University library support to student mental health and well-being during COVID-19
Dr Andrew Cox



Andrew Cox and Liz Brewster (Medical School, Lancaster University) undertook a survey of how university libraries are supporting student mental health and well-being during COVID-19. 

The survey was open from 18th to 29th May 2020.

This is a brief report on some of the main results of the survey.

There were a total of 59 valid responses, representing 49 different institutions (some institutions gave more than one answer). Two were from outside the UK. For the purposes of this short initial report we have not de-duplicated responses. Of the responses 17 (29%) were from library directors and 13 (22%) from staff with a particular responsibility for the subject. 

We are offering limited interpretation of the data at this stage. Watch this space for a pre-print of the paper using the survey.

We would like to thank everyone who participated in the survey, and those who helped distribute it.

Is the library undertaking any activities to support student mental health and well-being during the CV-19 pandemic? 

46/59 (78%) said “yes”. The following data relates to these 46 replies.

What kinds of activities are being specifically offered by the library to support student mental health and well-being during the CV-19 pandemic? Online learning materials, emphasising digital support on web site, reassuring messages, suspension of fines, linking to Uni well-being related services

Giving students access to additional learning materials online

41

89%

Reorganising website to emphasise digital support options

39

85%

Reassuring messages via social media

39

85%

Suspension of fines

38

83%

Linking to home university well-being related services

34

74%

Recommending leisure reading and content streaming sources

30

65%

Listing remotely-available well-being related books

27

59%

Highlighting lighthearted and/or distracting content via social media

24

52%

Offering webinars on other topics students are concerned about e.g. accessing resources remotely

21

46%

Additional FAQ related to well-being

11

24%

Offering webinars on well-being related topics

7

15%

N=46

 

 

What communication channels and/or formats is the library using to communicate mental health and well-being related content? The library web site and Twitter 

Library web site

37

80%

Twitter

36

78%

Facebook

27

59%

Instagram

23

50%

Online video calling software (e.g. skype, teams etc)

20

43%

Email

18

39%

Weibo

0

0%

“Others” included the library blog, libguides and newsletters.

Which populations are you aiming to support with your mental health and well-being activities? Primarily taught students.

Undergraduates

45

98%

Postgraduate (taught)

45

98%

PhD students

40

87%

Academic staff

34

74%

Professional and allied staff

30

65%

Contract researchers

23

50%

Which populations are engaging with the library’s mental health and well-being activities?  Taught students

Undergraduates

17

37%

Postgraduate (taught)

14

30%

PhD students

11

24%

Academic staff

9

20%

Professional and allied staff

8

17%

Contract researchers

0

0%

Cannot specify particular groups but evidence of engagement

28

61%

No evidence of engagement

3

7%

How is the success of these activities being evaluated? Thank you messages, resource accesses and retweets/favouriting

Thank you messages received from students/staff

20

43%

Number of people accessing recommended resources

20

43%

Retweets/ favourites of content

19

41%

Number of messages distributed/ broadcast

13

28%

Number of people attending webinars

13

28%

We do not evaluate our well-being activities

13

28%

 Have you seen any changes in the number/ focus of helpdesk queries?

Increased frequency/ same focus

6

16%

Increased/ different focus

8

21%

Decreased/different focus

13

34%

Decreased/ same

7

18%

Same

4

11%

Open text comments suggest shift of focus is towards access to electronic resources.

How would you define the problem you’re trying to address?  Student concerns about study and access to resources, and also building a campus community and loneliness during social distancing

Student concerns about study/ access to resources

42

91%

Building sense of university community

30

65%

Loneliness during self isolation / social distancing

27

59%

General anxiety and depression

22

48%

Digital well-being as an aspect of digital skills

18

39%

Boredom

14

30%

Misinformation about the virus/fake news

10

22%

Stigma around mental health

9

20%

Worries about coming out of lockdown

8

17%

Health concerns about the virus

6

13%

Prejudice towards some groups of students, e.g. Chinese students

4

9%

What was the main reason you decided to prioritise mental health and well-being related activities at this time? Aligning to the institution

We have taken the initiative to align with university strategy

15

36%

We are formally coordinating with university strategy

9

21%

We are responding to student demand/ concerns

8

19%

Other

8

19%

We have seen other libraries undertaking similar activity

2

5%

N=42

Note: The question required respondents to pick one choice, when they may well have had a mix of drivers.

Do you have any other comments about library involvement in student mental health and well-being during the crisis?

Comment: Responses reflect diverse practices: some people see mental health and well-being as a core activity, some confine the role to signposting. In other cases resources have not been available, reflecting the pressure libraries are under in the crisis. Library staff well-being is a related topic.

“As a third space, Library should take the opportunity to get involved mental health initiatives and help drive the agenda”

“As previously mentioned we are mainly a referral route for student mental health and well being our focus is more on teaching and learning support plus signposting.”

“We took the decision to prioritise wellbeing activity and re-established a working group which had been active previously however it has disbanded due to workload pressures “

“We have also focused on the mental health and wellbeing of library staff […]”

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Time in Sheffield as a Visiting Researcher - Dr Abdulhalik Pinar

Returning to Sheffield after more than a decade has been a mixture of nostalgia and new opportunities. I first came here in 2011 to complete my MA in Librarianship, and now, I find myself back as a visiting scholar at the Information School. My time as a visiting researcher at the University of Sheffield has been truly rewarding. I am an academic staff at Harran University in Turkey supported for this visit by Tubitak (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey). This visit has been a great opportunity for my academic and professional development. I am conducting research on artificial intelligence within GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums) institutions. I have especially valued the support of my supervisor Dr. Andrew Cox who has guided me through this process. He is an extremely helpful, supportive and understanding person. The University of Sheffield has provided me with an excellent working environment, surrounded by helpful staff and dynamic research...

Generative AI paper authored by Dr Kate Miltner among British Academy's 13 discussion papers on "good" digital society

 The British Academy has today published thirteen discussion papers from a range of expert perspectives across the ‘SHAPE’ disciplines (Social Sciences, Humanities and the Arts for People and the Economy) to explore the question: ‘What are the possibilities of a good digital society?’  The papers explore a wide range of issues, from the environmental impacts of digitalised daily life to the possibilities of ‘good’ Generative AI in the cultural and creative industries, to examining more closely what we mean by a ‘good digital society’. Among the papers is one authored by information School Lecturer Dr Kate Miltner, with Dr Tim Highfield from the Department of Sociological Studies. Their paper focuses on "good" uses of generative AI in the cultural & creative industries. Alongside the papers is an introductory summary that provides a thematic overview of the papers and points to how we might conceptualise the principles that underpin these diverse visions of a good digital ...

LILAC 2024 - There’s always a hidden owl in knOWLedge

MA Library & Information Services Management student Wafa shares her experiences from the LILAC Conference 2024. I was fortunate to receive one of two #LILAC24 Conference bursaries that took place in Leeds, generously provided by the wonderful Information School ! I always make the most of ‘library world’ events, but this was by far the most enlightening and thought-provoking conference I have ever attended. It was my first visit to Leeds, and I made the most of it. I joined the local library (housed in a beautiful Grade II listed building), took a late-night stroll around town, and visited the grand mosque, where I happily stumbled across adorable bunnies in the Leeds University Eco Garden! The city is filled with culture and numerous higher education institutions, making it an excellent choice for a conference focused on information literacy.  Top Left: Mila the Media and Information Literacy Alliance turtle crocheted by Eva Garcia Grau  Top Right: Me and my library car...