Information and the body
The study of information behaviour[1]
has traditionally focussed on documentary sources of information and to some
degree information that is shared through interaction. Such an emphasis reflects
the origins of the whole field in the
study of information behaviours of users of libraries and other institutions
that provide access to encoded forms of knowledge. Yet the centrality of embodied experience in all aspects of
human life makes the relative neglect of the body in information behaviour
studies surprising and potentially problematic, as a number of authors have
suggested (Cox, Griffin and Hartel, in press; Lueg 2014, 2015; Lloyd 2009,2010,2014;
Olsson, 2010, 2016). This special issue of Library
Trends on “Information and the Body” seeks to bring together researchers
interested in embodied information, including how we receive information
through the senses and the way the body is used as a sign that can be
interpreted by others.
Several intersecting research developments bring greater
attention to embodied information. There are early hints at the importance of
this theme in a number of information behaviour studies, for example Bates
(2006), Prigoda & McKenzie (2007), and Hartel (2007). An increasing focus
on information practices in the field offers a useful starting point for more
fully theorising the relationship between information and the body (Lloyd,
2008). There is a growing interest in phenomenological studies of information, which
would also be likely to elaborate our understanding of the role of the body in
information behaviour. Other
perspectives are important too: For example, Lueg (2014, 2015) has drawn on
notions of embodied cognition in his work on the role of the body in
information behaviour. Also relevant may be the growing interest in materiality
in archive and museum studies, and in the study of reading and internet
studies. While emerging from different philosophical roots, these strands of
thought seem to be coming together as an important new direction in information
research, towards information and the body. In many other disciplines, such as
education, history, geography and sociology, the body and materiality have been
of central interest for several decades, this should motivate information
researchers to catch up.
The need to recognise the importance of the body in
information behaviour scholarship may also be prompted further by developments
at the level of practice. Heightened interest in the library world in the
importance of physical space and its design also implies a concern with the
body and the material world. Haptic interfaces that allow the user to interact
with a computer in rich sensory ways or self-tracking of bodily functions using
apps and wearables, are just two of many trends that signal the end of the myth
of disembodied virtuality. Interest
in information phenomena within contexts that are centred on the body, such as
medicine, sport, music and cooking likewise demand new approaches – and it has
already been shown to be relevant in everyday workplace contexts.
As other disciplines have begun to engage with bodily
experience a corresponding methodological debate has also occurred (Pink,
2015). This typically points to the value of ethnographic and auto-ethnographic
work, as well as arts-based,
visual, multimodal, and other sensory methods. Relatively few
connections have been made to date between work in information behaviour to these wider
methodological developments.
We invite contributions to this special issue that draw on
such approaches as practice theory, phenomenology, embodied cognition and
sensory studies. We also recognise the importance of critical cultural
perspectives and seek a diversity of viewpoints to be represented. Submissions
may be theoretical, methodological, or empirical in nature. Mature
contributions will be favoured over pilot studies or works in progress. Research
drawing on a wide range of methods is welcomed and we will entertain
submissions in a variety of novel representational formats
Schedule
If you are intending to submit an article, or require
further guidance regarding topicality or suitability, please contact Andrew Cox
(a.m.cox@sheffield.ac.uk), Jenna Hartel (jenna.hartel@utoronto.ca) or Brian
Griffin (brian.griffin@mail.utoronto.ca), the issue editors.
Guidance for authors https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/library_trends/guidelines.html
Final articles should be between 4000 and 10,000 words.
Call for Papers: Fall 2016
Submission deadline for extended abstracts (1000 words): January 1, 2017, with notice of acceptance on January 15.
Submission deadline for accepted papers: 1st June 2017
Publication February 2018 (Vol. 66, No. 3).
Call for Papers: Fall 2016
Submission deadline for extended abstracts (1000 words): January 1, 2017, with notice of acceptance on January 15.
Submission deadline for accepted papers: 1st June 2017
Publication February 2018 (Vol. 66, No. 3).
References
Bates, M.J. (2010), “Information behavior”, Encyclopedia of Library and Information
Sciences, Vol. 3, pp. 2381–2391.
Cox, A.M., Griffin, B. and Hartel, J. (in press), “What
every body knows: Embodied information in serious leisure ” Journal of Documentation.
Hartel, J. (2007), Information
Activities, Resources, and Spaces in the Hobby of Gourmet Cooking, PhD
Dissertation.
Lloyd, A. (2009), “Informing practice: information
experiences of ambulance officers in training and on-road practice”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 65 No. 3,
pp. 396–419.
Lloyd, A. (2010), “Corporeality and practice theory:
exploring emerging research agendas for information literacy”, Information Research, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp.
15–3.
Lloyd, A. (2014), “Informed Bodies: Does the Corporeal
Experience Matter to Information Literacy Practice?”, in Hilary Hughes, Kate
Davis, Christine Bruce, Ian Stoodley and Helen Partridge (Eds.), Information Experience, Vol. 9, Emerald
Group Publishing Limited.
Lueg, C.P. (2014), “Characteristics of human perception and
their relevance when studying information behavior”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 70 No. 4, pp. 562–574.
Lueg, C.P. (2015), “The missing link: Information behavior
research and its estranged relationship with embodiment”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,
Vol. 66 No. 12, pp. 2704–2707.
Olsson, M. (2016), “Making sense of the past: The
embodied information practices of field archaeologists”, Journal of
Information Science, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 410–419.
Olsson, M.R. (2010), “All the World’s a Stage–the
Information Practices and Sense-Making of Theatre Professionals”, Libri,
Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 241–252.
Prigoda, E. and McKenzie, P.J. (2007), “Purls of wisdom: A
collectivist study of human information behaviour in a public library knitting
group”, Journal of Documentation,
Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 90–114.
[1] For simplicity we continue to use this phrase as the
umbrella term, though we recognise the debate surrounding the terms information
behaviour, information practice, information experience, information activity,
etc.
Comments